Wednesday, 13 November 2013

Tenderness


Tenderness by Natalia Lysenco

Locked


Locked by Alex Levine

beautifully shaped colors


colors from Alaska by Mel Hagai

Breath by Andrea Pozzi


Waterfall and autumn colors in Plitvice National Park, Croatia.

Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked


Motorola held a special event today to reveal its new Moto G, a spiritual sibling to the Moto X and a way for the Google-owned smartphone maker to bring its vision of a customized mobile device future to even more consumers with much more affordable pricing. “Now we’re setting our sights on the world,” is how Motorola CEO Dennis Woodside put it during the event today. Noting that most people can’t afford a $500 or $600 phone today, Woodside said that the average worldwide is more around the $200 mark. Those phones offer really bad experiences, however, according to Woodside, using old tech that shows especially poorly when running modern apps. Woodside cited a Galaxy Fame phone as an example of a cheap device made poorly, and last-gen phones as the only other option. “We believe half a billion people deserve better,” Woodside said, before announcing the Moto G. The Moto G offers an experience that can even rival the Galaxy S4 and other modern top-end superphones according to Woodside. The 4.5-inch display, with 720p, 329 PPI resolution is the “hero feature” of the phone, and it outperforms the iPhone 5s according to Motorola. It has a Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 1.2 GHz processor with 1GB of RAM, and offers “all-day” battery life. That means around 14 hours of talk time on 3G networks, vs. 10 claimed for the iPhone 5s. It ships with Android 4.3, and there’s a guaranteed upgrade coming to Android 4.4, by January of 2014. There’s no LTE on board, which makes sense given the target market (growing, developed countries where LTE is in limited supply or nonexistent). Motorola is keeping customization key to the product, too, with custom shells like its more expensive predecessor, and there are new flip shells that protect the screen and back. Software on the Moto G was designed to build from pure Android, add value to Google’s vanilla OS and provide the user with more capabilities. Motorola VP of Product Management at Motorola Mobility Punit Soni specifically called out the foolishness of adding complex skins to Android. It’s a predictable stance: Moto is now a Google subsidiary, obviously, and Soni comes from Google. Soni also said they focused on the basics when optimizing software, instead of trying to jam a bunch of features in. This allows it to “punch way above its weight with respect to competitors”. The Moto G outperforms the Galaxy S4 on boot time, browser launch, return home, making calls and more, Soni notes, which is a validation to the team that focusing on basics is more important than complicating things with skins. There is some software added, including Motorola Assist, which is a predictive software feature that tries to develop a profile of how you use your phone in order to anticipate your needs for optimal performance. They’ve also tried to focus on the camera software, which Soni said is capable of taking excellent photographs in every setting possible. The proof will be in the pudding, however, so I’ll reserve judgement until I get a chance to put it through its paces. Moto G buyers get an additional 50GB of Google Drive storage free with the phone (in addition to the 15 that comes with the service). There’s also an FM receiver in the phone for “access to free music,” and dual-SIM support in select markets. Soni said that this approach of marrying value with features is what to look for from Motorola and Google’s combined efforts going forward. The 8GB version in the U.S., unlocked and contract free is just $179. The 16GB version is just $199 unlocked, so still sub $200. At these prices, Google and Motorola might be able to steal away a big chunk of the low-cost feature phone market that Microsoft aims to transition to Windows Phone with its acquisition of Nokia. It’s on sale today in Brazil and parts of Europe, and will launch in the coming weeks in the rest of Europe, Canada (at Telus and Koodo within the month) and more. In the U.S., and a number of other countries it’ll launch early next year.

Lonely Planet Acquires Mobile Travel App TouristEye


Earlier this year, we wrote about TouristEye, a mobile app for planning trips and discovering new things to do while traveling. Today the startup is announcing that it has been acquired by travel heavyweight Lonely Planet, as that company seeks to broaden its portfolio of products. TouristEye has been around since 2010, founded by a group of entrepreneurs in Spain to create a mobile-first app for building itineraries and collecting things to do while traveling in new cities. The app aggregated data from multiple sources to build profiles of landmarks and things to see in locations around the world. There are a number of apps available for finding out more about things to do while traveling. The big differentiator for TouristEye, however, was that it allowed users to add items to an itinerary which could later be viewed offline, so users could have access to their trip plans and locations even when they weren't connected to WiFi or didn't have a data plan while abroad. The big turning point for the company came after it was a part of the 500 Startups Accelerator, at which point the team got a better understanding of its own internal metrics, which features mattered, and which were driving engagement in the app. At the time it entered, only 7 percent of users were returning to the app on a regular basis, according to co-founder Ariel Camus. It was able to increase that dramatically by giving users advice on things they could do nearby for weekend trips or local getaways, even when they weren't traveling. While TouristEye was able to increase engagement and grow its user base, it still faced competition against the giants of the travel industry - competition like Lonely Planet, which has its own series of guides and mobile apps. And so, rather than compete, Camus and team decided that it made more sense to join one of the heavyweights. For TouristEye, the acquisition will give it a lot more resources, including access to Lonely Planet content and the help of its massive distribution network in the travel and tourism industry. Lonely Planet, meanwhile, gets some mobile expertise as users shift slowly from buying expensive, heavy, and sometimes outdated travel guides to carrying apps around with them in their pockets. In each case, the teams are hoping to leverage their communities and data to improve the mobile experience for users. While terms of the deal weren't disclosed, Camus said TouristEye investors walked away happy. The company had raised a modest $500,000 from 500 Startups, Plug And Play Innovation Center, and a group of European angels.

A Pin On Pinterest Is Worth 25% More In Sales Than Last Year, Can Drive Visits & Orders For Months


According to new data sourced by the social marketers at Piqora (previously Pinfluencer), the value of a pin on Pinterest growing – today, a pin generates 78 cents in sales, on average. That's up by nearly 25 percent from Q4 2012, says Piqora. More importantly, perhaps, is the fact that a pin can drive both pageviews and orders several months after its original pinning. Pinterest pins deliver two site visits and six pageviews, on average, and more than 10 re-pins. That's more viral than Twitter, the company notes, where posts are only retweeted 1.4 percent of the time Piqora, which originally arose to track Pinterest usage before Pinterest itself got into the analytics business, has since expanded its reach and rebranded to reflect its broader footprint across other social networks, like Tumblr and Instagram, for example. But it still has a deep understanding of what's going on across the Pinterest network, thanks to its earlier efforts. Today, hundreds of brands turn to Piqora for its insights, including Overstock.com, Steve Madden, Crate&Barrel, ZGallerie, AMC, Sephora, Orbitz, HauteLook, and Shape, to name a few. To reach its conclusions about the growing value attached to a pin, Piqora's engineers analyzed 1,000 brands on Pinterest from February of this year through the end of October, including both e-commerce brands and other publishers. It found that, overall, Pinterest was maturing as a social commerce platform, as more brands began to add “Pin It” buttons to websites, and introduce more Pins that led back to product pages. In terms of the pin's value calculation, the company explains that includes the visits and orders driven by the re-pins across the Pinterest network, too. And if you're surprised by the number, remember that it includes a wide range of brands – not just e-commerce sites that appeal to Pinterest's core, and largely female, audience, but also other publishers. Says Piqora CEO Sharad Verma, some categories among e-commerce brands could do even better, when they're more in line with what Pinterest users like. “Martha Stewart was getting 10x more traffic last year from Pinterest than from Facebook,” he says. “So obviously there are cases where a publisher or retailer in a visual space like food, fashion or home decor is very likely to be getting way over two site visits [per pin].” In other words, a pin's real value depends on what you're selling – so the numbers will vary from site to site. But what's interesting about the collected data is that it shows the network can enable product discovery over a period of time, well after the first pinning takes place. Half of site visits take place 3.5 months after the first pinning, while half of orders take place 2.5 months after the pinning. “Good pins are frozen in time on Pinterest,” explains Verma. “The network has a very strong memory – if a product is pinned, it signals it's a product worth buying.” The reason products do well for so long on Pinterest is the way the site is structured. On social networks like Twitter and Facebook, information discovery and the user experience is concentrated on the feed. Users are not browsing much beyond their feed to look for other information. But on Pinterest, users navigate to other categories and popular sections, allowing them to find more items. These new findings are relevant given Pinterest's high valuation following several large funding rounds, which value the network at $3.8 billion. Over the course of this year, Pinterest has finally started its monetization efforts, initially by introducing tools for brands like rich pins and product pins, as well as pin recommendations (ads) that appear in users' feeds and category pages. Verma notes that Pinterest's traction on mobile could be a hint toward where the company could go with those monetization efforts in the future. Piqora's analysis found that Pinterest's mobile user base grew by 50 percent this year with 75 percent of the usage happening on mobile (according to data from brands' own analytics). “I do believe that Pinterest is gradually becoming the Google of the visual web,” Verma says. “We believe that Pinterest is emerging as the starting point of product discovery and product entertainment on mobile devices.” Users could begin turning to Pinterest when they want to look something up in the product realm, and that could lead the network to own e-commerce product discovery. “Advertisers could then pay for persistent and prominent product placements, just as those advertisers did on Google,” he adds. It's worth noting, too, that the clicks and revenue data Piqora collected comes ahead of the 2013 holiday season, when those are likely to surge as users go online shopping for gifts this month and next. Last Q4, the company found a pin was worth 64 cents, and ahead of the holidays, it's already worth much more. Piqora should have additional analysis around Q4 2013 when this shopping season wraps.